Powered by Fleet News and Mail Online

27/4/2007
Letters

Council's majority party can actually be defeated at the polls

Council’s majority party can actually be defeated at the polls

As the local elections approach, political sabre-rattling is predictably rife. The door of the skeleton cupboard is open wide and ‘Land West of Park Street’, ‘planning irregularities’, ‘promotional videos’ and ‘campaigning skulduggery’ are being raked over for every ounce of electioneering value.

That’s a pity because local elections should be above politics. National party policies have little to do with managing a local authority and councillors have absolutely zero influence on the diktats handed down by central government of whatever flavour. Their duty is simply to work within that framework for the benefit of the local community.

Advertisementyour story continues below

In Surrey Heath the majority party has been unassailable for as long as can be remembered. It knows that, with a whip imposed, it can carry any vote in the council chamber without fear of defeat.

This is a very bad situation for all of us. It means that our elected representatives never need to look over their shoulders.  These are the people spending our money. We have for years now given them a free hand. They can do what they like with it — they can hire in temporary staff and consultants (I wonder why they can’t recruit the staff they need?).

They can make expensive self-congratulatory videos. They can buy concrete balls to place outside the heavily subsidised theatre. Now it’s not for me to argue the rights and wrongs of these actions. My point is that there is no effective opposition to make our majority councillors think long and hard about their decisions and to seriously consider the opinions of others.

You may say that there is no chance of a change in the majority party in Surrey Heath. That’s true, but that’s not what is needed. Just look at these figures:

  • Of our 40 councillors, 21 represent the majority party.
  • If the majority party lost three seats at this election we would theoretically have a ‘hung’ council, ensuring more considered decisions based on local needs rather than political strategy.
  • It would only take 170 tactical votes to achieve this.
    So please, consider setting your politics aside for a general election and voting for the good of your local community. Here’s how to do it:

1. Please use your vote on polling day.

2. If a minority party member or independent represents your ward, support them with your vote this time.

3. If a member of the majority party represents you, vote for the representative of whichever party came second last time.

This strategy will succeed and Surrey Heath will benefit from a stronger management team as a result.

Richard Collings
Highbury Crescent
Camberley

First printed in: Aldershot News and Mail

Other Letters
Fight hard if you are opposing a developmentAlternate week bin collections trial is an ordealLibrary cuts of £1m are not an investmentWe’ve heard all the Aldershot talk beforeYes, please focus on our hospitals Gordon BrownTown is slowly being driven into the groundHelp improve the quality of life for home’s residentsOur faith in QEB inspector already dashedThanks to man who came to mother's rescueIt's too late to rescue our rundown townBarracks site minitown needs its own surgeryHospital is actually one of the safest in the countryWho are they trying to fool now over Galleries fiasco?Bingo is much needed and far from a mindless gameCouncil's majority party can actually be defeated at the pollsMP wrong about borough’s affordable housing recordImproved sex education must be a priorityJoin the brown envelope protest at tax increasesCompensation would ease effect of extra flightsMake easy cuts to pay for CCTVNoise can cause serious stress problemsDepot scheme is a trade-off I cannot acceptPoints without having a licence are not logicalBridge story sounds like an April FoolGurkhas have earned the right to equal respectLeisure centre is made dirty by people who use itOne way to cut costs is to reduce collection timeMP should be grateful that we have the GurkhasPetition the Prime Minister for fairer Gurkha pensionsGolf course trees will grow slower than envisagedLack of parking will put pressure on neighboursThanks for your support of the glorious GurkhasAn expensive report that will end up gathering dustGraffiti swastika offensive in Home of the British ArmyMPs expenses are tiny compared with workloadNHS reforms need more consultation and more timeBoard of experts to run council is a brilliant ideaThere is no real alternative to this vital link roadPlease press for review of town's crazy parkingFatal combination that has spawned ineffective councilThere are also plenty of positives in the districtExtra flights will bring benefits for FarnboroughI would love to live on the edge of the airportAbolishing free parking amounts to a gross betrayalI do not want a huge airport on my doorstepSilent majority has no problem with extra flyingTAG appeal will ensure maximum fairness all roundFrimley Park has the solution to parking problemAppeal is all about rich and powerful greedy for moreMy joint interests with MP are not commercialSo, does our MP provide us with a 'junk' service?NHS experts must give us realistic options for futureYes, judges should be tough on speedingVillage needs recycling centre at supermarketTraffic problems in rat-run lane getting worseNo, commercial waste does not get a subsidyCouncillors seem unable to take tough actionWidening tracks the only way to improve railwaysHospital parking problem could get even worseLib Dems have a plan to save post officesUnitary county article ignored important issuesEmpty office sites could be made available for housingAWC subsidies commercial waste going to landfillStation's neighbours suffer from shortage of parking spacesTown badly needs a minor injuries unitThe planning process is so frustratingWhat does the county do with our money?
Letters Archive
Browse older items in our Readers' Letters Archive