8/3/2007
Letters
An expensive report that will end up gathering dustAn expensive report that will end up gathering dust
In the Fleet News of February 23 , you published a fulsome description of Fleet in 20 years’ time as envisioned by Cllr Denis Gotel. He took as his inspiration, a report entitled Fleet Town Centre Urban Design Framework and Analysis Report, submitted to Hart Council in November 2006 by the management consultancy firm W S Atkins.
I have on my desk a copy of that report. Because of the considerable expense Hart Council incurred commissioning it, I asked the Hart legal department, under the Freedom of Information Act, to let me know was it had cost. Here is the reply I received:
“Under the act, the council has 20 days in which to respond to requests and I am hopeful that you will receive a response within the time limit.”
You may well ask as I did why, when the information is now available, I have to wait 20 days to get an answer to my question.
More to the point, why was such a report commissioned in the first place. Wearing my former hat, I can estimate that the work undertaken by W S Atkins, will have cost the Fleet tax payers hundreds of thousands of pounds. Given the parlous state of the council’s finances — income £8.5million, expenditure £10m — this report will end up like many others gathering dust on the council’s shelves.
It will never be implemented. Some of the huge cost involved detailed examination of the options for the future of the town’s layout, hotel and leisure facilities.
When a councillor was asked why the people of Fleet were not invited to give their views on the future of their town, the councillor replied, such views would only be opinions and not evidence.
What hope have we for the sensible governance of our town when such arrogant assumptions are made by our concillors about our inability to suggest what is good for our future?
John Lidstone Fleet via email
First printed in:
Aldershot News and Mail
|